How Ripple’s Own Stablecoin Could Hurt XRP’s Price

Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, just hit a market capitalization of $1.56 billion, up from just $132 million at this time last year. By any measure, the stablecoin has been a smashing success since its launch in December 2024.

That’s great news for Ripple, the company behind XRP, but it’s a problem for the cryptocurrency’s investors.

Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an “Indispensable Monopoly” providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »

I see why XRP holders might be excited by RLUSD’s adoption. Ripple’s growth is Ripple’s growth, right? More products should mean a bigger ecosystem, and a rising tide lifts all boats.

But I think that misunderstands the situation.

XRP’s core value proposition has always been its role as a “bridge asset,” providing liquidity in Ripple’s payment product — formerly known as On-Demand Liquidity (ODL). Before RLUSD, when a bank sent dollars from the U.S. to euros in France, Ripple converted the dollars to XRP and then back to euros. XRP was the middle step — and it still can be, but so too can RLUSD.

And as a dollar-pegged stablecoin, it’s exactly that — stable — and stability is what banks are after. They tend to avoid dealing with volatile assets as much as possible.

This makes RLUSD a no-brainer for most financial institutions that want to use Ripple’s liquidity product, and the more institutions that opt for RLUSD, the less opt for XRP.

Ripple knows that banks want stability and has pivoted hard into pushing RLUSD as the premier bridge asset. The company spent $200 million to acquire the stablecoin payments firm RAIL, and its website now prominently features “integrate stablecoin payments into your business” — not “use XRP for faster transfers.” Ripple clearly seems to be building its future around stablecoin infrastructure while XRP is sidelined.

I’ve been saying for a while now that the fundamental bull thesis — that the adoption of Ripple’s technology will drive XRP demand — was already flawed. The fact is, most banks have no need for Ripple’s liquidity features and only use its messaging technology, which doesn’t involve XRP at all.

But there was at least some demand pressure from the smaller subset of institutions that did want liquidity. That is now being undercut by Ripple itself. The more RLUSD is adopted, the less XRP is needed.

I think that most of XRP’s price is driven by hype and is based on a misunderstanding of how the Ripple ecosystem operates. I would avoid XRP.

Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $514,000!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,105,029!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 930% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 187% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of March 14, 2026.

Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

XRP vs. RLUSD: How Ripple’s Own Stablecoin Could Hurt XRP’s Price was originally published by The Motley Fool