The most considerate people in any room are often the worst offenders when it comes to apologizing. They say sorry when someone bumps into them. They apologize before asking a colleague a perfectly ordinary question. It looks like humility, and sometimes it is, but often it is something stranger: a repair reflex firing at nothing, aimed at ruptures that never happened.
“Sorry, is now still a good time?” I said, on a call I had scheduled myself, at the exact minute we had agreed on, to a person who had asked me to call. There was a small pause. “Why are you apologizing?” she asked. And I realized I genuinely did not know.
I apologize for things that are not mine to be sorry for. For years I filed this under politeness, maybe a feminine habit, maybe a cultural one. Then I started noticing who else does it, and a pattern showed up that I have not been able to unsee.
Why do so many thoughtful people apologize for existing?
The chronic over-apologizers I know are often the most considerate people in any room. They are quick to take the blame, quick to smooth things over, quick to assume a problem must somehow be their fault. From the outside it reads as humility. Up close, it often looks like something that was installed early, by people who never modeled the very thing the over-apologizer now performs on a loop.
I have a friend who apologizes when she cries, as though her own sadness were an imposition on the room. I have another who says sorry to waiters when her order comes out wrong. These are competent, generous women, and not one of them is weak. When you get to know their childhoods, the same shape tends to sit in the background: a parent who could hand out blame freely and could not, under any circumstances, receive it.
Here is the question that got under my skin. What happens to a child whose parent never says sorry? I do not mean the occasional missed apology, which every parent is guilty of. I mean a household where repair simply does not happen, where the adult is always right, the child is always the problem, and a rupture just hangs in the air until everyone quietly moves on.
What a child learns when nobody repairs
This is where the research is genuinely clarifying. The developmental psychologist Edward Tronick, who created the famous still-face experiment, found that parents and babies fall out of sync surprisingly often, and that security grows from how reliably those mismatches get repaired. In his words, “the more telling piece is the repair.” A child does not need a flawless parent. Tronick is blunt about it: “to be perfect is not really the way you want a parent to be with a child. You want there to be mistakes so learning can occur from the mistakes.” The thing that matters is that the mistake gets mended. When a parent ruptures the connection and then comes back to it, the child learns that closeness can survive conflict and that trust can be rebuilt. When the parent never comes back, never names the rupture, the child is left to make sense of the alarm alone. If no one ever returns to fix what broke, the only available conclusion is that the broken feeling must belong to them. They grow up still holding it.
I should say that in plenty of cultures, including the one I come from, a parent apologizing to a child is not exactly traditional. The generational hierarchy is strong, and admitting fault to a child can feel, to that parent, like handing over authority they were taught to guard. I do not think most of these parents were cruel. Many were simply repeating what had been done to them, passing along a silence they never thought to question.
How the wound turns into constant apology
So how does a child who was never apologized to become an adult who apologizes for everything? My reading, and I want to be clear this is my interpretation rather than something Tronick himself studied, is that the instinct for repair does not vanish. It simply gets aimed in the wrong direction. Having never received a repair, the child grows up and becomes the one who repairs, compulsively, preemptively, for things that were never broken in the first place.
The over-apology is a repair attempt with no rupture to fix.
It is the grown child still trying to mend a relationship that was never mended for them, except now they do it with everyone, constantly, as a reflex. Saying sorry becomes a way to get ahead of a rupture before it can hang in the air the way it used to at home.
Can you actually unlearn it?
I think you can, slowly, and I am working on it myself. The first step for me was just catching the word as it leaves my mouth and asking whether anything is actually owed. Usually nothing is. I am learning to swap the reflexive sorry for something truer, like a simple thank you for waiting, or for nothing at all. It feels strange the first hundred times, and then it starts to feel like standing up a little straighter.
The bigger work is doing for my daughters what I want them to carry. When I snap at Emilia because I am tired, I go back and tell her I am sorry, that it was not her fault, in plain words she understands more of every year. I am not a psychologist, but I want repair to be so ordinary in our home that she never has to grow up and perform it on strangers just to feel safe.
If you recognize yourself in the constant apologizing and it traces back to something heavier than a habit, it is worth unpacking with a good therapist, because patterns set that early are hard to see clearly from the inside. You are allowed to take up space without saying sorry for it. Most of the time, there was never anything to apologize for.
-1024x683.jpg "Strait Outta Hormuz: Getting the Iran Oil Story Straight")
