Polygon co-founder Sandeep Nailwal went on the protection towards “ecosystems who’re feeling defeated & jealous.”
The remark was motivated by a tweet from Mert Mumtaz, the co-founder, and CEO of Helius Labs, who identified Polygon had acquired extra VC cash than Solana and had used the funding to “pay individuals to make use of the chain and purchase corporations.”
Polygon has acquired over 130M extra in funding than Solana
Polygon makes use of the cash to pay individuals to make use of the chain and purchase corporations
Solana makes use of it to enhance the tech and construct the neighborhood and has *hundreds* of extra nodes
do with this data what you’ll pic.twitter.com/ZOG6vs63hR
— mert | Helius (🧱, ⚡) (@0xMert_) December 6, 2022
Helius creates utility programming interfaces (APIs) to simplify on-chain knowledge for Solana builders. The thought behind that is to make Solana mission improvement faster and extra environment friendly.
Polygon is worse than Solana, claims Mumtaz
For the reason that FTX collapse, the narrative round Solana has taken a giant hit.
Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) had backed Solana to usurp Ethereum. This prolonged to SBF creating the SOL-based Serum DEX to bolster the chain’s attain and enchantment.
Chapter filings present the trade held $982 million price of SOL on its stability sheet. Nevertheless, the not too long ago appointed CEO John Ray III, who was introduced in to “clear up” the corporate, stated the whole failure of company controls he inherited meant he lacked confidence in the accuracy of the monetary statements.
Mumtaz thought it related to level out Polygon had acquired $50 million from FTX’s sister firm Alameda, but doesn’t endure the identical put-downs as Solana.
What’s extra, on the first criticisms leveled at Solana, together with its battle of curiosity by way of VCs and centralization points, the scenario is way worse when the identical arguments are utilized to Polygon, stated Mumtaz.
it is absurd that by some means Solana will get painted because the centralized VC chain whereas Polygon actually has 1) 10x the VC involvement 2) has hundreds of much less validators 3) can actually be stopped by the core group at any time 4) nonetheless has a lot much less TPS whereas being 100x extra centralized
— mert | Helius (🧱, ⚡) (@0xMert_) December 6, 2022
Nailwal disagrees
In response to Mumtaz, Nailwal stated “Polygon received” not due to wielding VC cash to purchase favor; as a substitute, it “received” due to the “energy & pull of Ethereum.”
He stated that entities need to construct on Ethereum, “not on half-baked L1s.” Put merely, Polygon’s attraction boils right down to it offering entry to the Ethereum chain.
Addressing the matter of VC affect, Mailwal stated investments had been made at a time when Polygon was valued at $8 billion. This meant VCs managed round simply 5% of the MATIC token provide.
The thread ended with Nailwal conceding that no ecosystem is ideal. However he prefers to give attention to bettering and inspiring others, quite than bad-mouthing the competitors.
