The company’s revenue from operations came in at Rs 810 crore, an impressive 40% increase from Rs 578 crore recorded in the corresponding quarter of the previous financial year.
The sharp gain in revenue was driven by strong execution momentum across renewable energy projects and higher contributions from key business verticals.
EBITDA rose to Rs 305 crore in Q4 FY25–26, marking an 80% increase from Rs 169 crore in the same period last year. This came on the back of a larger scale of operations, improved operating leverage and disciplined cost management.
Profit before tax (PBT) stood at Rs 214 crore, up 54% year-on-year from Rs 139 crore. The increase was largely supported by stronger project execution, a better revenue mix and improved operational efficiencies.
The company’s EBITDA margin improved to 36.6% from 28.3% year-on-year.For the full year, total revenue came in at Rs 2,742 crore, marking a 56% increase from Rs 1,755 crore in FY24–25. KPI’s profit after tax (PAT) rose to Rs 509 crore, up 57% from Rs 325 crore, the company said in a regulatory filing.Alongside earnings, the company has recommended a final dividend of Re 0.25 per equity share and a special dividend of Re 0.15 per share following the successful energisation of its 1 GW IPP project. This takes the total dividend to Re 0.40 per equity share of face value Rs 5 each for FY25–26, subject to shareholder approval at the upcoming Annual General Meeting.
KPI management said: The year marked important progress in the Company’s transition towards an asset-backed renewable energy platform, with strengthened long-term revenue visibility from contracted IPP projects, continued order wins from marquee customers, successful project energisation, financial closure of new projects and entry into utility-scale Battery Energy Storage Systems.
Investors cheered the Q4 results as KPI Green shares rallied 10% to an intraday high of Rs 501 on the BSE on Wenesday.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
