Share this article
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has reportedly found the recent applications for spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) to be lacking in clarity and comprehensiveness, according to the Wall Street Journal.
A number of companies recently filed applications for spot Bitcoin ETFs, such as Invesco, Wisdom Tree and BlackRock, among others.
The SEC has communicated to the Nasdaq and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (Cboe) that their filings, which represent the interests of various asset managers, are not “sufficiently clear and comprehensive,” according to the Wall Street Journal. Feedback states that companies should have specified the spot Bitcoin ETF would enter into a “surveillance-sharing agreement,” or at least provided adequate information about the details of such arrangements.
However, the SEC’s response is not a definitive rejection. The asset managers have the opportunity to revise and resubmit their applications with the necessary clarifications.
This move by BlackRock prompted ARK Invest and 21Shares to revise their third application for a spot Bitcoin ETF to include a similar agreement. Other firms that have followed suit by amending or refiling their applications include Invesco, WisdomTree, Valkyrie and Fidelity. ARK Invest is currently considered a leading contender in this endeavor, as the company fixed its application and filed an application before the others had a chance to amend:
JUST IN: ARK has amended their 19b-4 for spot bitcoin ETF to include a surveillance sharing agreement bt CBOE and a crypto exchange (likely Coinbase), which makes their’s like BlackRock’s filing now, and puts them in pole position to be approved first bc they filed first. pic.twitter.com/P8PCmPdhln
— Eric Balchunas (@EricBalchunas) June 28, 2023
It’s worth noting that the SEC has been rejecting applications for spot Bitcoin ETFs since 2017.
Grayscale’s spot Bitcoin ETF was denied in 2022 despite the company doing everything in its power to get it approved. Grayscale sued the SEC when the Commissioner rejected the ETF, with United States courts started probing the SEC in March 2023, on its seemingly unexplained decision:
“The SEC has not offered any explanation.”
Share this article
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
See full terms and conditions.