PFFA’s active management and leverage delivered a ~10% yield and 32% five-year return, while passive rival PGX lost 5% over the same period.
PFXF strips financials from the preferred universe entirely, making it the right tool for investors already overloaded with bank credit elsewhere in their portfolio.
PFFA’s 2% expense ratio compounds relentlessly against underperformance, making it suitable only for income maximizers who fully accept leverage and manager risk.
Don’t wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
Preferred stock ETFs sit in an awkward corner of the income market: too rate-sensitive to feel like true fixed income, too subordinated to trade like common equity. That structural quirk is where the active-versus-passive debate gets sharp, and where the Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (NYSEARCA:PFFA) makes its case against low-cost benchmarks like the Invesco Preferred ETF (NYSEARCA:PGX).
A9 STUDIO / Shutterstock.com
The question: Is PFFA’s 2.11% expense ratio earning its keep against rivals, including PGX, the iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (NASDAQ:PFF), the Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (NYSEARCA:PFFD), and the VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF (NYSEARCA:PFXF)? For a specific type of investor, yes. For everyone else, cheaper tools do the job.
Why the Preferred Market Rewards Active Right Now
The 10-year Treasury sits at about 4.5%, near the middle of a roughly 4% to 4.7% range this year. Preferred shares are perpetual, deeply subordinated, and priced almost entirely off long-duration risk-free rates plus a credit spread. When the curve chops sideways, passive indexes end up owning whatever the biggest issuers have printed most recently, mostly bank capital, at whatever yield the market clears. An active manager can pick and choose across coupons, call dates, and issuers to squeeze more income out of the same asset class.
Don’t wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
PFFA: The Active Case With Leverage Attached
The preferred ETF market rarely gets more actively managed than the Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The fund runs roughly $2.41 billion across 196 holdings, uses modest leverage with total assets of $2.95 billion against net assets of $2.35 billion, and its manager routinely holds multiple series of the same issuer to capture yield differentials that passive indexes often miss.
A closer look at the portfolio shows how different the strategy is from a traditional index approach. PFFA owns five different series of Triton International preferreds, six series of Chimera Investment, and four series of Vornado Realty. A passive fund would either equal-weight these positions or skip the smaller series entirely. Active selection lets the manager lean into whichever coupon or call structure looks mispriced.
Income is a major part of the appeal. PFFA distributes $0.1725 per share monthly, a forward annualized rate of $2.07, translating to a trailing yield of roughly 9.81%. Monthly payouts have climbed every year since 2022, increasing by $0.0025 per share annually.
The performance record validates the fee. PFFA returned roughly 8% over the past year and roughly 32% over five years. The tradeoff: leverage amplifies drawdowns when preferred spreads widen, and the 2.11% expense ratio compounds relentlessly against underperformance.
PGX: The Passive Yardstick That Reveals the Gap
The preferred ETF benchmark is the Invesco Preferred ETF (PGX), which tracks the ICE BofA Core Plus Fixed Rate Preferred Securities Index. Performance has been muted, with the fund returning roughly 2% over the past year and falling about 5% over five years. Monthly distributions have also trended lower, declining from a $0.68698 full-year total in 2024 to a $0.5904 annualized run rate now.
The passive approach works when preferred spreads are tight and rates fall. In the current chop, an index that mechanically rebalances into whatever the biggest bank capital issuers have priced most recently produces middling income and price stagnation. PGX suits investors who want cheap, transparent, financials-heavy preferred exposure. Anyone paying attention to the five-year total-return gap relative to PFFA should ask whether “cheap” is the same as “good.”
PFF: The Default Choice, and Why That Is a Problem
The iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) is the largest preferred ETF by assets, and the fund that many investors buy by default. Its index leans heavily toward U.S. bank and insurance preferreds, creating concentrated exposure to financial-sector credit. As regional banks have been forced to reprice deposits and raise capital, that concentration becomes a factor that investors should choose intentionally rather than inherit.
Cost is where the iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF separates itself from actively managed rivals. PFF’s expense ratio is a small fraction of PFFA’s. The fund is a benchmark tool: broad, liquid, cheap, and unopinionated. If your goal is to add preferred beta without a strong view on issuer selection, PFF does the job.
PFFD: The Passive Alternative Built to Undercut on Fees
Global X launched PFFD explicitly to undercut PFF and PGX on cost. The fund tracks a broad U.S. preferred index at one of the lowest expense ratios in the category. Holdings and sector weights end up looking similar to PFF, with heavy exposure to financials and a mix of fixed-rate and fixed-to-floating structures.
The Global X U.S. Preferred ETF is built for the fee-focused passive buyer. Investors who want preferred exposure without paying for active selection can access the asset class through one of the lowest-cost options. The tradeoff is limited differentiation compared with other broad passive funds.
PFXF: The Contrarian Pick That Deserves a Look
The VanEck Preferred Securities ex Financials ETF is the fund that a basic screen often misses. VanEck built the strategy to remove financials entirely from the preferred universe, leaving exposure to REITs, utilities, telecoms, and industrials. Investors already loaded up on bank credit through common stock holdings, other bond funds, or business-development company positions can use PFXF to add preferred yield without increasing financial-sector exposure.
Stripping out financials means giving up the deepest, most liquid slice of the preferred market. Yields have historically run slightly lower than broad indexes, and sector-specific shocks hit harder. For an investor whose portfolio is already tilted toward bank risk, that is a feature, not a bug.
Which Fund Fits Which Investor
Income maximizers who understand leverage and accept the 2.11% fee drag should look at PFFA, whose 9.81% trailing yield and multi-year outperformance versus PGX suggest the active premium has been earned in this rate environment. The beta of 0.68 also suggests the leverage has not translated into equity-like volatility.
Cost-conscious buyers who want plain-vanilla preferreds should pick PFFD for the lowest fee, PFF for the deepest liquidity, or PGX if they already own it. Investors worried about concentrated bank exposure should build a position in PFXF and pair it with something else for yield.
The one profile that should walk away entirely: an investor who wants the yield of PFFA but not the fee, the leverage, or the manager risk. That fund does not exist. Preferred stock in 2026 is a market where you either pay for security selection or accept the index return, and the five-year performance gap between these two philosophies has rarely been more visible.
Don’t wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.
