Enterprise architecture leaders face unprecedented pressure to cut through complexity. Technology portfolios are sprawling, operating models are in flux, and the mandate for strategic alignment has never been more urgent. In Enterprise Architecture Management Suites Landscape, Q4 2025 report, we examine a market that is consolidating, accelerating, and quietly reinventing itself.
Rather than unpack every detail here — that’s what the full report delivers — let’s zero in on three structural shifts every architecture leader must track. Each is reshaping the discipline at its core and signaling where the next wave of value will emerge.
1. AI Is No Longer Optional — It’s Embedded in EA Work
Across vendors, one theme was impossible to ignore: AI has moved from augmenting EA work to orchestrating it.
EAM suite providers are betting big on intelligent companions, advisory agents, and automated impact analysis that frees architects from the grind of cataloging, mapping, and maintaining asset relationships. Architects increasingly expect the same level of contextual intelligence that teams in operations and service management are already embracing. As Julie Mohr notes in The Future Of Enterprise Service Management Is Intelligent, AI is becoming a force multiplier that shifts teams from reactive work to proactive insight. The same tipping point is now coming to EA.
In the report, we highlight how leading vendors are experimenting with AI agent hubs that consolidate fragmented data and proactively suggest improvements. These capabilities won’t replace architects anytime soon, but they will change how architecture is practiced, accelerating time-to-value and elevating EA’s position in strategic decision-making.
The appetite for guidance, not just governance, is growing and AI is quickly becoming the companion that makes it possible.
2. Outcome‑Based Architecture Is Emerging
Most EA teams today fall somewhere on a spectrum from tech‑centric portfolio management to business‑driven capability planning. But our analysis shows a small (and growing) cohort of organizations pushing toward something different: outcome‑based architecture.
This is the model where architecture extends beyond designing capabilities to shaping customer journeys, value streams, and cross‑functional work patterns in effect, acting as a nervous system for how the business delivers value.
In the Landscape, we estimate that only 15% of clients are mature enough to operate this way but those who do are raising expectations for what EAM suites must provide next. They want tooling that connect strategy to execution, not just repositories of assets and taxonomies. They want architecture to live where decisions are made, not where documentation is stored.
This echoes a broader EA practice shift shift. In my previous blog, Architects Must Go Where Value Flows And Make Process Outcomes The Center Of EA, I argued that architecture must embed closer to operational outcomes to stay relevant in an era of agentic and automated workflows. The momentum building around outcome‑based architecture reinforces that point.
Vendors that can model, simulate, and recommend changes based on business outcomes; not just architectural elements will set the pace for the next wave of leadership.
3. The EA Tools Market Is Consolidating
This is no longer a fragmented market of niche players. Over the past three years, the major vendors we track have grown 13–19% annually, fueled by investment and M&A. Leadership is consolidating around a handful of platforms that combine scale, partner ecosystems, and strong AI agendas.
For buyers, consolidation cuts both ways.
On the one hand, large platforms can offer better integration across architecture, portfolio, process, and operational data, especially as enterprise architecture becomes inseparable from transformation programs, service workflows, and AI‑enabled operating models.
On the other hand, consolidation raises questions about dependency, pricing leverage, and the pace of innovation. The same tensions playing out in other enterprise platform markets are now reaching EA. Julie Mohr’s recent analysis on The Only Path To Autonomous Operations Is Built On Trust highlights how trust, transparency, and governance shape platform decisions and EA leaders face similar challenges as vendor scope expands.
What it means for EA leaders
It’s no longer enough to evaluate EAM suites on features alone. Buyers must assess vendor vision, AI strategy, and alignment with their own operating model maturity. The market winners are those that evolve with you, not just sell you a tool.
The EA function is at an inflection point. As technology, data, and AI converge, the value of architecture is shifting from documentation to decision enablement. From static models to continuous insight. From expert‑driven governance to distributed, democratized knowledge.
The EAM landscape reflects this shift and the full report, Enterprise Architecture Management Suites Landscape, Q4 2025, offers a detailed view of vendors, capabilities, and differentiation.
Have questions? That’s fantastic. Let’s connect and continue the conversation! Please reach out to me through social media or request a guidance session. Follow my blogs and research at Forrester.com.
This market is moving fast.Your architecture practice should, too.
